Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Maternity-Shoot Photographer Proves He Didn't Manipulate His Images
glamour.comwas not faked. The photographer said so and brought receipts.The Sussexes were dragged into after the admitted to (heavily) .
The Daily Mail, in typical Daily Mail fashion, then combed through its archives to find any scrap of evidence that Meghan Markle had ever photoshopped anything and came up with a quote from Markle's friend Misan Harriman, who, on a podcast, described taking their pregnancy announcement pictures.
By taking Harriman's words out of context, the Mail claimed () that he was essentially admitting to faking the picture. And Harriman, understandably, did not like that one bit.This content can also be viewed on the site it from.In a video posted to Instagram, the photographer and director demanded a retraction and apology from outlets that had run with the story, explaining that he took the photo remotely using the couple's iPad, and that the only editing he did afterward was to put it in black-and-white.This content can also be viewed on the site it from.As further proof, he also uploaded the original, full-color image.This content can also be viewed on the site it from.(The Mail also dug up , and in that case, the picture taker also shared the original picture on social media, and it looks like it wasn't manipulated!
Shocker!)Amid the whole picture debacle, anonymous “sources” have gone to bat for the Sussexes, telling Page Six, “This isn't a mistake that Meghan would ever make.… She has a keen eye and freakish attention to detail….
Read more on glamour.com