Arguing about Margot Robbie’s hotness is insane—and really dangerous

nypost.com:

Urban Dictionary defines “mid” as someone who “on a scale of 1-10 is like 4, 5, 6, or 7 based on looks” and is “just like every other girl.”“This is her without makeup,” one Twitter user quipped of Robbie, posting a photo. “Definitely mid.”That tweet has been viewed more than 62 million times as of Monday afternoon.“She is a hard 7,” another declared. “You used to find a Margot Robbie in every Blockbuster Video in 1995.”The digs at Robbie’s looks come as the Australian sex symbol is set to star in the “Barbie” movie, out July 21, with some actually implying she isn’t attractive enough to carry the role.“Margot Robbie was cast in Barbie explicitly because she isn’t pretty enough to alienate a female audience,” a tweet with 2.6 million views reads. “Where are the big Barbie doll t–s?”Robbie is perhaps the closest human equivalent to a wildly disproportionate, literally plastic caricature of what a woman should be — and anyone claiming otherwise is out of their mind, or trolling for clicks.And the expectation that Robbie could somehow more literally resemble a Barbie doll is absurd at best, and sexist at worst.In fact, according to analysis by South Shore Eating Disorder Collaborative, a life-sized person with Barbie doll proportions would be 5’9” with a 39-inch bust, 33-inch hips and a measly 18-inch waist — not to mention a size 3 shoe.No wonder many on Twitter came to the actress’s defense.“This new trend on Twitter trying to convince us that Margot Robbie is mid is insane,” one user declared.Another posited that the trolls degrading her looks were either “partially blind, not attracted to women, or aliens.”It goes without saying that Margot Robbie — who has played incredibly provocative characters “The Wolf of Wall.