Meghan Markle & Prince Harry Make 3 Requests to Attend Coronation, Sources Reveal If Palace Might Accommodate & If They'll Actually End Up Attending

Prince Harry reportedly tried to see his father, King Charles III, on his recent trip to the U.K., but was told the monarch was “too busy.”

The Coronation of King Charles is just weeks away, and there are still a number of questions surrounding the attendance of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex previously confirmed that the couple had received an invitation, however they are still yet to publicly announce whether they will be in attendance.

The late Queen Elizabeth II’s eldest son, Charles is preparing to officially be crowned King on 6 May, and prep for the major event is in its final stages. While the UK public are busy planning street parties and bank holiday soirées, members of the Royal family are getting ready for one of the most important dates on their calendar this year, and perhaps, of their lives.

The coronation of King Charles could be "overshadowed" by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, royal commentator Daniela Esler has warned. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have confirmed they have received an invitation to the big day - but they are yet to announce whether or not they will be attending.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are faced with a decision that could further deepen tensions within the British royal family. It’s still unclear whether the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will travel across the pond in May for King Charles’ coronation.

she’ll receive the 2023 Women of Vision award from famed feminist Gloria Steinem next month.Perhaps the committee behind the Women of Vision could benefit from a trip to the optometrist. According to a new tax filing made public last week, Markle and her trauma-loving husband each put in only one documented hour of work a week for their Archewell Foundation in 2021.

Four The Chase contestants left chaser Anne Hegerty completely unimpressed as she realised they all shared a royal connection that was both surprising and "so adorable I may puke". During Tuesday night's episode of the hit ITV gameshow, presenter Bradley Walsh welcomed all four players to the studio for another round of quizzing.The contestants were called Archie, Louis, Charlotte and George - all eager to get stuck in to try and earn some money for their pots. But as the group's names were announced, viewers nearly fell off their chairs to hear that they all had the same monikers as four Royal children.

Prince Harry hasn’t packed his bags just yet.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle worked a total of 52 hours a year on their foundation, averaging out to one hour per week. The revelation was made in 2021 tax filings from Archewell, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s nonprofit.The IRS 990 filing was recently posted on Archewell’s official website. Royal expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital the admission is "totally inconsistent" with the original statement the couple made in 2021.

King Charles III may «very much» want Prince Harry and his grandchildren to attend his upcoming coronation, a source tells ET that the royal family feels Harry and Meghan Markle attending could divert attention away from the historic event.A source close to the royal family tells ET that there's concern that if Harry and Meghan attend the May 6 coronation ceremony in London, it could steal the spotlight from the king himself.«The big concern is the chaos that could overshadow the coronation if they attend,» the source says. «No one wants to see the focus taken away from King Charles with the press focused on Harry and Meghan and past family squabbles.»The source adds, «The fear is — if they do come — more private matters could be made public, so efforts are being made to prevent that.»As ET reported last month, a source close to the royal family had said Charles «very much wants Prince Harry and his grandchildren at his coronation.» This came after a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex told ET that the couple had been invited by email.«The duke has recently received email correspondence from His Majesty's office regarding the coronation.

Meghan Markle found royal life “very difficult” because of the Queen Mother’s “well-worn mantra”, an expert said. The Duchess of Sussex, 41, rose to fame playing Rachel Zane in US legal drama Suits and her celebrity background meant she had freedom to express herself as she wished - often through her now defunct social media blog, The Tig.

Prince Harry stayed at Frogmore Cottage during his surprise return to the UK last week, sources have claimed. The Duke of Sussex, 38, is understood to have stayed at the Windsor home while he attended the preliminary hearing in his claim against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) at the Royal Courts of Justice.

before King Charles evicted him — while visiting the UK last week, the Telegraph reported.The former royal, 38, made a surprise appearance in court for his phone-hacking case against the Daily Mail, joined by other high-profile celebrities such as Sir Elton John and model Elizabeth Hurley.Harry did not see his father during the visit, according to the Telegraph, but the Duke of Sussex retrieved possessions that he and Meghan Markle left at Frogmore Cottage and shipped them to their $14 million Montecito, California mansion.Following the release of Harry’s bombshell memoir, “Spare,” the king allegedly ordered the couple — who were gifted the home by the late Queen Elizabeth II as a wedding present — to vacate the residence. According to reports, the Sussexes were “disappointed” to leave the five-bedroom property they had “made their home.”Prince Harry did not see his father during the visit because the King was too busy, the Telegraph reported, noting it was his first visit to the UK since receiving eviction orders.A royal insider previously claimed that Charles decided to evict the couple after his son described Queen Consort Camilla as a “wicked stepmother.”“It was the last straw,” an insider told the Mirror.

We’re about one month away from King Charles‘ coronation on May 6, 2023 and some information is slowly being revealed about the guest list.

Meghan Markle could land prominent acting roles after hiring a well-known Hollywood dealmaker, a PR expert has said. The Duchess of Sussex, 41, who rose to fame starring as Rachel Zane in US legal drama Suits, is working with respected industry “fixer” Adam Lilling, according to reports. Meghan and Prince Harry are said to have met Adam as Ellen DeGeneres and her wife Portia de Rossi renewed their wedding vows in Los Angeles last month.

Meghan Markle is to receive another award – this time for her “lifelong advocacy for women and girls”. The Duchess of Sussex, 41, has been named as one of this year’s Ms. Foundation Women of Vision – a prize run by America's oldest women's foundation.The award will be presented to her by political activist and friend Gloria Steinem, who Meghan has been seen with on several occasions.

Ms. Foundation, a Brooklyn-based organization that “works to bring attention to the real challenges facing women, especially women of color and low-income women who are living in poverty” and advocates for policy changes at both a statewide and national level.The Ms. Foundation announced that Markle will be receiving the award “for her global advocacy to empower and advocate on behalf of women and girls.”“We are thrilled to announce this year’s honorees for the Women of Vision Awards and to celebrate 50 years of progress and power,” Teresa C.

Meghan Markle. The 41-year-old Duchess of Sussex has been announced as one of the honorees for the 2023 Women of Vison Award.

Samantha Markle is not giving up without a fight. Meghan Markle's sister is taking another legal shot at the Duchess of Sussex after her defamation lawsuit was thrown out, refiling the claims that the judge dismissed without prejudice.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry could be risking it all if they no-show to King Charles III‘s coronation!

A bunch of world leaders and public figures will be heading to London next month for King Charles III’s coronation – but one person you won’t see in the crowd? President Joe Biden.

It looks like President Joe Biden will not be in attendance at King Charles‘ coronation.

Prince Andrew is determined to hold onto Royal Lodge, an insider has claimed. The source explained that Prince Andrew, 63, was handed the keys to Frogmore Cottage by King Charles two months ago but is allowing his daughter Princess Eugenie to stay there when she visits the family.

President Joe Biden will not be among the throng of dignitaries and world leaders descending upon London for King Charles III's coronation next month.According to, Biden has opted to skip the May 6 ceremony, citing prior commitments. The outlet reported, citing a source, that there «may still be some efforts underway to see if Biden can be persuaded to come to the Coronation.» Another source told   that declining the invite was «not locked and loaded.»What's more, the outlet reported that those who received «save the date» cards were asked to submit their answer by Monday. It's worth noting that no U.S.

Elton John was "surprised" when he found out Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were stepping down as senior royals, a source has said.

God save the king? As King Charles III prepares for his coronation, the monarch is facing backlash for a variety of reasons — many of which are pegged to his special day.

Gwyneth Paltrow won the trial of the century, a dispute with a septuagenarian over a 2016 skiing accident at a ritzy Utah mountain resort.And she didn’t even have to try on a glove — though I assume if required, it would have been a cashmere-lined, leather one from Prada.Gwyneth simply leaned into her crazy, rich self — dripping with luxury goods and grieving over her missed half-day of skiing.Her yield? One very petty dollar.A juror told Good Morning America that they sided with the “Shakespeare in Love” star after a snow expert essentially poured cold water on the recounting of events by Dr. Terry Sanderson — who claimed Paltrow plowed into him on the slopes.

A US court has dismissed a defamation case brought against the Duchess of Sussex by her half-sister, Samantha Markle.The Duchess was accused of spreading “demonstrably false and malicious lies” to a “worldwide audience” in the royal couple’s tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021. On Thursday, a Florida judge dismissed the lawsuit though, saying the former Suits actress was expressing “an opinion about her childhood and her relationship with her half-sibling” and a statement of pure opinion was “not capable of being proved false”.

Meghan Markle scored a small victory in court, after a judge sided with her in her half-sister, Samantha Markle's, defamation lawsuit against the Duchess of Sussex. But Samantha's lawyer is saying not so fast, telling ET the legal fight is not over.According to court documents, obtained by ET, United States District Judge Charlene Honeywell in the Middle District of Florida ruled in favor of Meghan after she dismissed with prejudice the majority of claims in the lawsuit, specifically pertained to the 2020 book, .Samantha had previously claimed in her lawsuit, filed in February, that Meghan «published and disseminated false and malicious statements» in that book, but the judge shot down the claims, saying «it is undisputed that [Meghan] did not publish» the book. The judge also dismissed the rest of Samantha's claims without prejudice, meaning she can re-file her lawsuit if she so chooses, and her lawyer,  Jamie A.

infamously announced that stepping down from “The Firm” would “provide our family with the space to focus on the next chapter, including the launch of our new charitable entity.”However, recently released tax documents for their Archewell Foundation report that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex hit the charitable grind just one documented hour a week in 2021.The nonprofit’s public IRS 990 filing, posted to Archewell’s official website, also revealed that the Beverly Hills-based organization raised just over $13 million from donors — with $10 million coming from one exceedingly generous private benefactor.Reps for the Archewell Foundation declined to comment — but an insider told The Post that reports of H&M “hardly working,” paired with “standard” tax docs, fail to paint a factual “full picture” of the work being accomplished by the duo’s charity.Archewell reported dispersing more than $3 million in grants to various refugee resettlement charities and and initiatives distributing millions of COVID-19 vaccines.Around $4,500 in public donations and an estimated $1,190 was also was accrued from “investment income,” the docs stated, while the foundation paid out $163,085 in salaries.The former “Suits” actress, 41, and Harry, 38, don’t take a paycheck from the nonprofit Archewell Foundation — but their CEO James Holt received a yearly salary of $59,846 and $3,832 in other benefits.

A royal victory. Meghan Markle has won the defamation lawsuit filed against her by half-sister Samantha Markle.

It’s a good day to be Meghan Markle!

Meghan Markle has won the defamation lawsuit her half-sister Samantha Markle filed against her.

It’s another legal win for Meghan Markle.

Meghan Markle has won the defamation lawsuit her estranged sister Samantha Markle filed against her in 2021. On Thursday, a judge threw out Samantha's case, saying that Meghan wasn't guilty because every statement she made that Samantha took issue with was an obvious opinion and therefore didn't meet the criteria for defamation.

Meghan Markle has successfully had her half-sister Samantha Markle's court case dismissed. She had accused the royal of spreading "malicious lies" during the bombshell Oprah Winfrey interview in 2021.